HAWE | Apr 2024 - Dec 2024
Delivering a partnership-winning product that became blueprint for digital change
Impact
Positive internal feedback highlighting major usability leap
worth of products introduced to the market
Role
- Research
- Strategy
- Design
- Implementation
Constraints
- Tight deadline
- Tech trade-off
- Market specific issues
- Missing analytics
- No external user access
Team
1x
Product Designer
1x
Product Manager
2x
Innovation Managers
2x
Developers

Project Summary
HAWE Hydraulik needed a digital tool to match competitors and win a key cartridge manufacturer partnership. In just 8 months, I designed and launched their first cartridge selection tool. Working as the only designer, I split one ambitious project into two MVPs, navigated tough technical constraints, and delivered the product that reached it's goal. It became the foundation for HAWE digital transformation.
Product Context
Focus Areas


goals
Building a digital tool for Million-configurations complexity
Our physical products offered hundreds of variations leading to millions of possible configurations. While competitors provided advanced digital configuration tools, we were still relying on person-to-person interactions.
Positioning as a cartridge solutions provider
Creating a digital presence that showcased our cartridge expertise and closed the gap with competitors.
Making cartridge solution configuration effortless
Empowering customers to seek out the perfect solution, reducing reliance on sales support and increasing order accuracy.
Aquire a major cartridge manufacturer partnership
A well-designed platform is a powerful tool for attracting new partners.
Streamlining manifold
design processSaving our engineers precious time on repetitive calculations and tasks.
challenges
Racing against exhibition deadline
Six months to showtime. This was our completely unrealistic, non-negotiable deadline for the hydraulics exhibition where we planned our grand reveal. After spending 2 months on research, initial designs and iterations, development pushed back.
Even though we collaboratively stripped down functionality to bare minimum, building a full manifold configurator in that timeframe wasn't feasible.
Critical constraints we faced:
Tech trade-off
We had to integrate the new functionality into the existing Product Finder, limiting what we could build.
Limited user access
I couldn’t interview external customers due to B2B sensitivity, so I had to rely solely on internal engineers.
Data blindness
We had no analytics in place, so there was no baseline to measure against.
Market mismatch
Releasing in the U.S. market first created friction with pricing systems and user permissions that were designed for Germany.
approach
Focus on driving value and alignment
Working between two teams, Customer Experience and Digital Tools, I wore multiple hats as researcher, designer, and actively participated in product strategy. I owned the entire design process from initial stakeholder interviews through post-launch optimization planning. My approach centered on rapid collaboration cycles.
Rapid collaboration cycles:
Daily
prototyping sessionsIterating on newly discovered information with the product manager and innovation team.
Bi-weekly
stakeholder reviewsTo validate direction and gather feedback.
Ad-hoc
cross-team alignmentInternally, on our design system with Webshop team to ensure design consistency as well as externally, with our development team.
key decisions
Workshopping our way to an MVP
Starting with user workflows
I began by conducting interviews with our internal specialists to map out how engineers design manifolds. Their main painpoints were repetitive tasks and manual calculations eating their time. I drafted a flow that would digitilize the process and built a simple prototype to present to our SMEs and check if we found a common understanding.
Pivoting to reality
After multiple rounds of iterations we landed on a product that stakeholders were happy about. I presented the prototype to our external development team and that's when we hit a wall. We had only 4 months to develop the app, and the development flagged it as too big of a scope to be able to make it in time.
Due to limited resources, product team made a decision it won't be a standalone app, as it was initially planned. The tool had to live inside Product Finder, which meant for me, that functionality and design had to be radically simplified. I proposed we split the project into two: deliver Cartridge Selection Tool now, and postpone Manifold Configurator for later.
Workshop that unlocked development
With a split product, we needed to reframe what our product vision was. I facilitated an MVP prioritization workshop using the MoSCoW method, categorizing features into must-haves, should-haves, could-haves, and won't-haves, focused on separating the 2 products. This session became our north star when making trade-offs later.
impact
Delivering Impact Despite Missing Metrics
The wins we could quantify
Even though simplified, the application launched on schedule and functioned flawlessly at the 0 day. More importantly, we secured the cartridge manufacturer partnership - validating our entire approach.
Promising post-launch indicators:
Task completion
rates increasedAs we simplified the prototype, our test users found it easier to use.
First cartridge
orders placedIn week 1 from the official launch
Overwhelming
positive feedbackEngineers found filtering capabilities especially useful
Sparking broader transformation
Internal users liked the MVP so much, they started demanding the same experience across all our tools. The filtering search functionality I designed for cartridge selection became the benchmark for our entire Product Finder redesign.
lessons
What I'd do differently
Include engineering from day one
Two months of initial design work had to be scrapped when we discovered technical constraints. Early developer involvement would have saved significant time and effort.
Fight for analytics infrastructure
Operating without metrics is like designing in the dark. I should have made analytics setup a precondition for project kickoff, not an afterthought.
Plan the launch, not just the build
We had no go-to-market strategy, no official release, no fireworks. The anti-climactic launch diminished the team's achievement and missed an opportunity for internal adoption momentum.
next steps
Moving from tool to platform
The Manifold Configurator remains in development, building on the patterns and learnings from our initial release of Cartridge Selection Tool. What started as a sales demo became the blueprint for Hawe's digital transformation in the German market.
What we achieved:
MVP
methodologyProved effective even in a traditional industry, enabling us to start small with a clear path forward.
Cross-functional
collaborationOur design system documentation became essential for aligning with the external development team.
Streamlined
quote preparationAutomated bill of materials reduced back-and-forth between internal engineers, sales team and external users.
Digital-first
customer interactionPaved the way for digital services, removing barriers for customers and empowering engineers to focus on what matters most.
What’s next:
Evolve into the Manifold Configurator
Build on the Cartridge Tool foundation in small iterations to support complete manifold design online.
Establish
analytics trackingIntroduce metrics to measure adoption, accuracy, and impact on sales processes.
Unify the
product ecosystemAlign the Product Finder, Cartridge Tool, and upcoming applications into a seamless customer journey.
Reach out
Let’s discuss strategy and impact
Scoping a realistic MVP can be quite a challenge. However, together with my team, I turned constraints into direction, guiding the project from an overwhelming scope to a focused, achievable MVP. If you’re looking for a designer who can turn complexity into clarity and be a partner in shaping product strategy, let’s connect.
- up next